Knowing about how screen printing worked when twisted multi-fiber thread mesh was common or the only thread available and synthetic threads were new is interesting but new products only hold a basic similarity in performance to that primitive equipment.

A laundry mangle is an interesting tool but knowing how to use one has noting to do with current methods for home clothing washing - compare that to what we have now in screen printing. Talking about chromate emulsions or rope and groove screens has simply become inapplicable history. Anything from the industry 10 or longer years ago is only interesting reference, mesh alone has improved vastly and even retensionable screens have had wonderful changes and additions in the recent years.

I started screen printing many years ago trying to find a way to make airbrushing t-shirt designs faster, I never stopped even when I wanted a "real" job. Of course how long you have been doing something, often wrong, and that would include myself, is not as important as if you listen, communicate and search for new information, you could call that continuous improvement if you like - see it fix it!

If a product works, why live with something that is as harsh on you as carburetor cleaner? Surely some harsher chemicals work faster or even "better" and I present this issue in every class. In fact, in my class we use examples of the mildest soy based chemicals, organic extract based chemicals, and the harshest of petroleum chemicals side by side so the students can see exactly how they work and make the judgement for themselves.

Lots of small shops start off in a building in a retail location with neighbors, and some (where legal) even start in their basement or garage - odor and close neighbors can be a big issue in this industry. I try and help the students understand efficiency in lots of areas, including art, exposure, reclaiming, and where some new products can even eliminate or shorten some steps. Certainly many things are not for every shop, but I like to review as much as is needed. Because I specialize in helping new and small shops I have learned you have to have some mercy and lots of patience.

I even have several sections in my class presentation where I talk about alternative products, how they work, and products that have real equivalents OTC (over the counter) and things that are simply myths or frustrations waiting to happen. In fact we are on the 20th revision of the class with a new workbook filled with custom drawings, micro photos, and information provided by the people who know, study and make the products.

Its not information just to fill pages, our class is filled with facts we have gathered continuously for years. We make continuous changes to the class when new products come out, and new methods emerge. We always look for the next screen printing myth to test - if things change or new facts come up it is immediately in the next class. I have found that if you want to know about emulsion spend time asking the great folk in the labs at the manufacturers factory. If we want to know about inks call a trusted representative then get a sample - find out - and try it out.

On a final note we don't compete with our customers, or students. We are in the industry to educate, and my part is to study screen printing, observe, test products, and work directly on site with shops providing information and troubleshooting. I am not going to manage the day to day operations of a business that would be competition with our students, many who end up as great friends.

I have been criticized for my use of a microscope in the industry, but what is nice about a tool like a microscope is that you can show why things like EOM work and why printed dots that are very small don't print well on t-shirts. A microscope will show how small dots can drop into a thread crevasse. I have found that the microscope gets lots of "ah-ha" moments especially with printers who have done things in an outdated way or with outdated equipment or methods, it shows clearly the limitations with equipment or product and points out the function and limitations of the five basic types of emulsions. In other words it is a great educational tool I like it and will continue to use it to help our students.

Chose an ink best for the substrate!

One of the longest running and frequent questions about printing on garments is the issue of fabric with polyester content and the use of plastisol ink.

The simple answer is that no matter how high quality your plastisol or how exotic the additives, there is a chance of "visual color transfer" often called bleeding.

The lower the content and effectiveness of your "blocking" additives and higher percentage of colored polyester content - the higher chance of that fabric color becoming visible in the ink layer. There is no plastisol that I have seen on the market - even the best available that cannot be defeated by even the simplest of red polyester garments.

There are now what seems like endless volumes of FREE information in this industry about the exact physical, temperature, and chemical interactions that cause "bleeding", in it's exact technical terminology but the simple answer is that polyester fabric and plastisol are and can interact because there is a basic chemical "compatibility" with the two products. This compatibility means that when we print plastisol on poly and heat it (as we need to cure it) this process can begin and can be so overwhelming that even the BEST of the "low-bleed" plastisol inks can be defeated. There are several stages involved in this color transfer I encourage you to read some of the excellent information from some of the respected quality Ink companies out there.

There are a few who will tell you that "bleeding" is all your fault, that you are just not keeping control of your heat with the flash or dryer - you only have to keep your heat high enough to cure plastisol and not go over the temp that causes the dyes in poly to start to sublimate (turn to a gas) often this is less than 10 deg. F. !

The other excuse I see is that the garments are of poor quality, and have too much dye, while this may all be true - often you (or your staff) have problems keeping tabs on your heat (like in the real world you never have problems ).

Of course to suggest that you can should only the highest quality fabrics to print or that you should control what garments the customer could order is ridiculous bordering on fallacious. Rather than attempt to cover for the weaknesses in a product why not find a quality alternative.

What to do?

Consider inks OTHER THAN plastisol.

Within a few months, there will be available (widely) on the market an ink that is a "dual-cure" that is formed by heat under 260 deg. F. into a "dry" layer and that within 24-48 hours makes a complete bond with the fabric - a silicone ink.

There are other products that are problematic, fabrics that are not capable of reaching the cure temp of plastisol without damage.

Recently an air dry, time cured ink became available on the market for products that cannot be heated to high temps.

While not as opaque as plastisol, simply lower the temp of your dryer, apply ventilation, this forms a dry layer over the product and the final drying can be in a ventilated area - great for the synthetic bags so popular in the grocrery stores now.

One of the most problematic garments are the athletic "wicking" products, swimsuits, spandex, and other garments that distort in and out of shape, plastisol with even the best "stretch" additive will never be able to stretch as much as the newer silicone inks.

Of course, to create an opaque layer of ink, especially with bright and dark garments the layer of ink is thicker, this can make things uncomfortable for the garment user, while somewhat unavoidable with plastisol as well as the newer inks, good control of deposit with quality screens can make this less uncomfortable, the choice may be a stiff water and air proof layer of stiff plastisol that has a high chance to bleed or a softer flexible coating that can be (but not always) rubber like. With the higher meshes the alternatives often have a softer hand than plastisol.

QCM inks makes the "rubber" but air dry ink, they can be contacted at the following:

QCM
930 Central Avenue South, Kent, Washington 98032 USA
1-800-321-0170
http://www.qcminks.com

Dow Corning is developing the silicone based ink, they can be contacted at the following:

http://www.dowcorning.com/content/textiles/screenprinting.asp